Re: How to make partitioning scale better for larger numbers of partitions

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Kato, Sho" <kato-sho(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to make partitioning scale better for larger numbers of partitions
Date: 2018-07-13 06:25:06
Message-ID: CAKJS1f89UxhJD4_JHf_DPJCzdMk_j=jfQFL605Fc863-T6t_9w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13 July 2018 at 14:58, Kato, Sho <kato-sho(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> Of course I'm sure table partitioning work well with up to a hundred
> partitions as written on the postgresql document.
>
> But, my customer will use partitioned table with 1.1k leaf partitions.
>
> So, we need to improve performance.
>
> Any ideas?

It would be really good if you could review and test my partitioning
patches in the current commitfest. These are the ones authored by me
with the word "partition" in the title.

These 4 patches don't solve all the problems, but they do make some
good gains in some areas. I've still more work to do, so the earlier I
can be finished with the 4 that are there now, the more I can focus on
the rest.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-07-13 06:28:52 Re: How to make partitioning scale better for larger numbers of partitions
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-07-13 06:20:27 Re: How to make partitioning scale better for larger numbers of partitions