From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Kato, Sho" <kato-sho(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How to make partitioning scale better for larger numbers of partitions |
Date: | 2018-07-13 06:25:06 |
Message-ID: | CAKJS1f89UxhJD4_JHf_DPJCzdMk_j=jfQFL605Fc863-T6t_9w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13 July 2018 at 14:58, Kato, Sho <kato-sho(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> Of course I'm sure table partitioning work well with up to a hundred
> partitions as written on the postgresql document.
>
> But, my customer will use partitioned table with 1.1k leaf partitions.
>
> So, we need to improve performance.
>
> Any ideas?
It would be really good if you could review and test my partitioning
patches in the current commitfest. These are the ones authored by me
with the word "partition" in the title.
These 4 patches don't solve all the problems, but they do make some
good gains in some areas. I've still more work to do, so the earlier I
can be finished with the 4 that are there now, the more I can focus on
the rest.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-07-13 06:28:52 | Re: How to make partitioning scale better for larger numbers of partitions |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-07-13 06:20:27 | Re: How to make partitioning scale better for larger numbers of partitions |