| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)lisasoft(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Choosing parallel_degree |
| Date: | 2016-03-17 11:21:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f-veM7c7hjQK-gqGXdPrWR5E=LeZ9qzUTAgje2T8RwvRQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 18 March 2016 at 00:13, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
> With the current threshold, you need a table bigger than 8 MB to be able
> to force parallel workers. I'm not sure there'll be benefits for
> multiple workers on a table smaller than 8 MB, since setting up all the
> parallel stuff takes time.
It would be really nice if it were possible to drop the setting really
low, so that combined with a low parallel_setup_cost we could enable
parallel query on small tables in the regression test suite.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-17 11:27:18 | Re: Minor typos in optimizer/README |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2016-03-17 11:13:26 | Re: Choosing parallel_degree |