| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Date: | 2017-12-19 04:41:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f-JzBHK5hgBheqLUAb-XQ1FJJYzx_KWk5snVqbOxybMXg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 19 December 2017 at 17:36, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Also, instead of using bms_intersect here, would it be better to do:
>
> result = bms_del_members(result, or_partset); ?
I should have said bms_int_members() rather than bms_del_members()
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | leoaaryan | 2017-12-19 05:38:43 | Re: Statically linking ICU with Postgres |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2017-12-19 04:36:44 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |