Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?
Date: 2018-06-12 01:37:42
Message-ID: CAKJS1f--mTZZzpj5g2bD0FEZgR-hYs+kQJxd+YPhMvuDrHnTpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12 June 2018 at 09:13, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hearing no complaints I pushed it with the proposed shape.

Thanks for working on it and pushing.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2018-06-12 02:00:57 BUG #15237: I got "ERROR: source for a multiple-column UPDATE item must be a sub-SELECT or ROW() expression"
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2018-06-12 01:09:30 RE: [bug fix] ECPG: freeing memory for pgtypes crashes on Windows