From: | David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problem with constraint exclusion on partitions |
Date: | 2014-12-20 07:39:50 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbzz5-nFoZpc_iJAn6kCT6qtHU-=0MfMHhm7hZEfjpkSw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Saturday, December 20, 2014, Mike Pultz [via PostgreSQL] <
ml-node+s1045698n5831551h5(at)n5(dot)nabble(dot)com> wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> > What version are you using?
>
> Sorry, I'm on 9.3.4.
>
> >Now() is a volatile function so the planner cannot omit partitions.
> >
> >Replace that with a constant and now it can.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean- now() is a stable function:
My mistake but unless it is immutable the planner cannot evaluate it, it
has to defer to the executor. The executor can evaluate it a single time
for the query but it is still left with the original execution plan given
to it by the planner.
> it's the timestamp at the start of the transaction- so the planner should
> have a set value for all rows.
> Am I missing something else?
>
>
Precise responsibility and timing mechanics between the planner and
executor which I cannot give adequate exposition on off the top of my
head...
David J.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Problem-with-constraint-exclusion-on-partitions-tp5831541p5831552.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G Johnston | 2014-12-20 08:07:42 | Re: Problem with constraint exclusion on partitions |
Previous Message | Mike Pultz | 2014-12-20 07:25:22 | Re: Problem with constraint exclusion on partitions |