Re: Review my steps for rollback to restore point

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: chandan Kumar <chandan(dot)issyoga(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review my steps for rollback to restore point
Date: 2025-03-04 15:38:07
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbzEDV2e4yfSpr8SkLyxEmAk=WPn3uo3C2q+1xR5VymVA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tuesday, March 4, 2025, chandan Kumar <chandan(dot)issyoga(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Thank you for your time and clarification.
> Does PITR recreate database internally ? can i say it is not the same as
> pg_restore or it is same as pg_restore plus applying WAL on top of it. I
> am asking because can we revern DDL operations without PITR in streaming
> replication
>

PostgreSQL doesn’t have a concept of “revert”.

PITR just deals with raw bytes on disk for an entire cluster. If a new
file appears in the WAL that file is created. That file can be a directory
for a database.

You cannot mix physical and logical images of the database so applying WAL
on top of pg_restore is technically invalid - but it does effective convey
the idea. It’s like saying pg_dump and pg_basebackup are similar. Sure,
in some ways that is true - but the logical vs. physical distinction cannot
be ignored fully.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message chandan Kumar 2025-03-04 15:42:54 Re: Review my steps for rollback to restore point
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2025-03-04 15:37:53 Re: Review my steps for rollback to restore point