Re: Shared WAL archive between master and standby: WALs not always identical

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sasa Vilic <sasavilic(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shared WAL archive between master and standby: WALs not always identical
Date: 2017-02-28 02:01:52
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbwTn81+WhGW=n-XOjftKkOy6hVOiDG9K44dJJCijysvA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:10 PM, David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> But IIUC the system seems designed around master->slave replication and
> doesn't support slave daisy-chains.
>
>
​I thought that sounded wrong when I wrote it...

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/warm-standby.html

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sasa Vilic 2017-02-28 02:32:00 Re: Shared WAL archive between master and standby: WALs not always identical
Previous Message Sasa Vilic 2017-02-28 01:52:53 Re: Shared WAL archive between master and standby: WALs not always identical