From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PegoraroF10 <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: execute block like Firebird does |
Date: | 2018-02-12 18:15:21 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbuwUjeOZ8nwtTfYd=TcwOtT55umD6PV3rR3z6_ZZo5sw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Monday, February 12, 2018, PegoraroF10 <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
> Explaining better my problem. All reports our customer use are
> customizable.
> So, when a customer runs a report it just runs all SQLs that are inside
> that
> report, being SQL or Execute Blocks. But because they are completelly
> customizable, one customer has 80 reports with 300 Execute Blocks on them
> and other one has just 10 reports with 100 execute blocks and they can be
> used to different purposes.
>
I love PostgreSQL...but why are you migrating away from something with this
extent of dependency on Firebird?
I'd probably be trying to figure out some kind of hybrid platform here and
not a clean cut-over.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-02-12 18:18:16 | Re: execute block like Firebird does |
Previous Message | PegoraroF10 | 2018-02-12 18:02:13 | Re: execute block like Firebird does |