From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Shinya Kato <Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Set AUTOCOMMIT to on in script output by pg_dump |
Date: | 2024-10-09 03:53:15 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbnNfH0RYcDnwYkhbXi_VK+yKHaMGvRP9J1vFrLHnze0w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, October 8, 2024, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Oct 2024 11:10:37 +0900
> Shinya Kato <Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Hi hackers!
> >
> > When SQL scripts created with pg_dump/pg_dumpall/pg_restore are executed
> > in psql with AUTOCOMMIT turned off, they will not succeed in many cases.
> > This is because the script contains SQL statements that cannot be
> > executed within a transaction block.
> >
> > If you simply add set AUTOCOMMIT on to the scripts created by
> > pg_dump/pg_dumpall/pg_restore, they will work fine.
> > A patch is attached
> >
>
> I am not sure if it is good to include psql's meta-command in
> pg_dump/pg_dumpall
> results. Can we assume users will always use psql to restore the pg_dump
> results?
Agreed. If we aren’t already outputting psql-only stuff I am a strong -1
for making this the first such case.
It would be nice to describe exactly when there is a problem as well since
very few things require being outside of a transaction. There might be
documentation or code patches possible here to improve matters (like adding
a switch to output begin/commit in the places we’re a user might want
single-transaction behavior) but this approach breaks well-established
encapsulation and overrides user expectations in a bad way (since
autocommit=on is the default they choose to turn it off so turning it back
on silently - not even documented - is bad.)
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2024-10-09 03:54:54 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2024-10-09 03:38:04 | Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns |