Re: Doubt in pgbouncer

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabio Pardi <f(dot)pardi(at)portavita(dot)eu>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Doubt in pgbouncer
Date: 2020-10-02 07:13:46
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbjPsdCuT3BX_mH_OgBL448=RehV-Rd8tfumev1GXc=Tw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thursday, October 1, 2020, Fabio Pardi <f(dot)pardi(at)portavita(dot)eu> wrote:

> Hi Rama,
>
> On 02/10/2020 01:42, Rama Krishnan wrote:
>
> Hi Friends,
>
> By using pg bouncer can we split read and queries
>
>
> pgbouncer is just a connection pooler.
>
> The logic where to send the reads and where the writes, should be in our
> application.
>

Seems as if pgPool is at least worth considering...

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Achilleas Mantzios 2020-10-02 07:32:26 Re: Doubt in pgbouncer
Previous Message Fabio Pardi 2020-10-02 06:50:45 Re: Doubt in pgbouncer