From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Trying to avoid a simple temporary variable declaration in a pl/pgsql function |
Date: | 2015-06-20 15:07:38 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbhT2NJKi2T3XH9drXu=5kGDMvPQOH2TKTbf9B8Q8uOfg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I know this could be written quite easily in sql but was wondering if it
> is
> > possible in pl/pgsql.
>
> > CREATE FUNCTION test_func()
> > RETURNS text
> > LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
> > AS $$
> > BEGIN
> > SELECT 'text_to_return' INTO <what_goes_here?>; --with or without a cast
> > RETURN <what_goes_here?>;
> > END;
> > $$;
>
> > The goal is to return the value of text_to_return without declaring an
> > explicit variable to name in the INTO clause.
>
> INTO requires a declared variable as target.
>
> However, I'm wondering why you don't just use "RETURN expression"
> if this is all that will be in the function.
>
>
The use of SELECT is required and will likely have a CTE and a set of SQL
CASE expressions as part of it.
It isn't a problem to declare it myself but I thought I had read about
there being an implicit variable name that could be used instead. I guess
I mis-remembered...
Thanks for the quick response.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jerry Sievers | 2015-06-20 15:51:06 | Re: Postgresql 9.2 has standby server lost data? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-06-20 14:56:44 | Re: Trying to avoid a simple temporary variable declaration in a pl/pgsql function |