From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | veem v <veema0000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How to do faster DML |
Date: | 2024-02-15 20:00:24 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbfVsF71FAfQEyku7+kQhB=zh59NpUzWh6KabHFPdDZcw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:18 PM veem v <veema0000(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> So one learning for me, i.e. one of the downside of fixed length data type
> is, with fixed length data types any future changes to it , will be a full
> table rewrite. And thus this sort of change for big tables will be a
> nightmare.
>
>
Yes, using the wording in the documentation, there is no such thing as a
"binary coercible" change for a fixed-width data type. Or for most types
really. Text is one of the few for which the typmod has no meaning and
there are variant spellings like varchar that allow for the underlying
storage representation to be the same.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2024-02-15 20:19:00 | Re: How to do faster DML |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-02-15 19:58:28 | Re: Trouble with v16 new CREATEROLE semantic |