Re: Docs for pg_basebackup needs v17 note for incremental backup

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Docs for pg_basebackup needs v17 note for incremental backup
Date: 2025-02-27 18:06:40
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbaPrbT_RhK3YB3oK5e0HHpsX7PmS6AAKL=DubBOQBh3w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:

> I'd be happy to help getting this in, do you have a suggested wording?
>
>
Thank you.

Attached.

David J.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Doc-pg_basebackup-incremental-requires-v17-server.patch text/x-patch 1.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2025-02-27 18:07:11 Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip
Previous Message James Hunter 2025-02-27 18:01:17 Re: Proposal: "query_work_mem" GUC, to distribute working memory to the query's individual operators