Re: Confused about a statement in WAL configs

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confused about a statement in WAL configs
Date: 2017-08-01 14:31:42
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbU2iGKHNgVDkUJQu8SRiF4Ev-eug8KL-gXSkvDKMM+bQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> I *think* I follow now: before the checkpoint, the dirty data pages had
> already been written to the WAL files, but not necessarily flushed to
> disk. The checkpoint flushes them all to disk as well.
>

​Yes, that it correct.

David J.​

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-08-01 17:33:37 Re: Use of term Master/Slave
Previous Message Jeremy Finzel 2017-08-01 14:23:29 Re: Confused about a statement in WAL configs