From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command |
Date: | 2023-07-13 15:40:35 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbRjAxHw6B3GkEgU9oizN4u1-u05kr3dUHWOaiqUhN=ig@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:01 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I plan to replace it to:
>
> > pg_catalog.concat_ws(', ',
> > CASE WHEN pam.admin_option THEN 'ADMIN' END,
> > CASE WHEN m.rolinherit THEN 'INHERIT' END,
> > 'SET'
> > ) AS "Options",
>
> That does not seem right. Is it impossible for pam.set_option
> to be false? Even if it is, should this code assume that?
>
>
That replacement is for version 15 and earlier where pam.set_option doesn't
exist at all and the presence of a row here means that set has been granted.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2023-07-13 15:41:29 | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2 |
Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2023-07-13 15:38:10 | Re: MERGE ... RETURNING |