Re: idle transactions vs memory

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: idle transactions vs memory
Date: 2020-12-07 05:41:32
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbP5XxNYnedk2vq3V7BGesHQdhf9G5F+6EJ-oMvQAwHgQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Sunday, December 6, 2020, Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The transactions state is 'idle' from more than 15 minutes, so my
> question is that are they occupying any amount of RAM?
>
> are these 'idle' transactions are using CPU ?
>
>
Sessions and transactions are two different things.

Yes, idle sessions consume a non-zero amount of resources.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2020-12-07 08:47:46 Re: idle transactions vs memory
Previous Message Atul Kumar 2020-12-07 05:34:03 Re: idle transactions vs memory