| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marc Millas <marc(dot)millas(at)mokadb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: index unique |
| Date: | 2021-06-08 19:35:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbOde_EXABmRZdDdUnm9w6JnJ==uXrTbi3GBmVyXm0dwA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday, June 8, 2021, Marc Millas <marc(dot)millas(at)mokadb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> but as this looks quite hard coded, it means that for long utf8 things
> the data length is not so long before hitting the limit.
>
> is there any plan to adress this ?
>
None that I’ve seen, and I don’t expect to see one either. Mainly because
I’ve yet to see or think of a use case that would warrant even considering
doing such, ignoring the fact that actually changing such a value is likely
to be a non-starter from a compatability perspective.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-08 20:05:14 | Re: index unique |
| Previous Message | Marc Millas | 2021-06-08 19:22:42 | Re: index unique |