| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <jim(dot)nasby(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column |
| Date: | 2024-02-16 21:37:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbOM1L0v6BP2qOybY=ZS08jS_D4oONLUET_9-ZNikGoLQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 2:29 PM Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
wrote:
> regress_du_role1 | no | Inherit | no | 2024-12-31 00:00:00+03(invalid) | 50 | Group role without password but with valid until
> regress_du_role2 | yes | Inherit | yes | | Not allowed | No connections allowed
> regress_du_role3 | yes | | yes | | 10 | User without attributes
> regress_du_su | yes | Superuser +| yes | | 3(ignored) | Superuser but with connection limit
>
>
Per the recent bug report, we should probably add something like (ignored)
after the 50 connections for role1 since they are not allowed to login so
the value is indeed ignored. It is ignored to zero as opposed to unlimited
for the Superuser so maybe a different word (not allowed)?
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-02-16 21:44:50 | Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2024-02-16 21:02:20 | Re: System username in pg_stat_activity |