| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guyren Howe <guyren(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mladen Gogala <gogala(dot)mladen(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better? |
| Date: | 2022-02-11 05:28:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbJ5Aun37K8+ZtgP5AvjOXLbTX0CAkc4h6Vb8td85s6EA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thursday, February 10, 2022, Guyren Howe <guyren(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2022, at 17:06 , Mladen Gogala <gogala(dot)mladen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> But SQL is a terrible, no good, very bad language.
>
>
> I cannot accept such a religious persecution of SQL without a detailed
> explanation.
>
>
> I feel like anyone who is defending SQL here isn’t aware of how much
> better the alternatives are, and how bad SQL really is.
>
>
>
I’m very comfortable in my ignorance and apathy here…since even you feel
resigned to use PostgreSQL presently. When you find an alternative you
will substitute for PostgreSQL let me know. I don’t see that PostgreSQL is
best served trying to make you happy on this front.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Raymond Brinzer | 2022-02-11 05:56:25 | Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better? |
| Previous Message | Guyren Howe | 2022-02-11 05:26:06 | Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better? |