From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Laura Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp(at)protonmail(dot)ch> |
Cc: | postgre <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Inline count on a query |
Date: | 2020-08-19 14:09:23 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbHU9Bc8UcN8P7xGExVr7DoC8VqYxHAUyjuw_o6G7T_Zw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday, August 19, 2020, Laura Smith <
n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp(at)protonmail(dot)ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let's say we've got a fairly basic table :
>
> create table networks (
> lan_id text not null,
> net_id text not null,
> port_id text not null
> );
> create index net_uniq on networks(lan_id,port_id);
>
> The query conundrum I am facing is that I need to add metadata to the
> output of the query that indicates the count of ports a given net has on a
> lan.
>
> So, for example, given :
> insert into networks(lan_id,net_id,port_id) values('L1','N1,'P1');
> insert into networks(lan_id,net_id,port_id) values('L1','N1,'P2');
>
> The metadata count would be 1, 2 (because 'N1' has 'P1' and 'P2' on 'L1').
>
> Is there a sensible way to query this without stressing out Postgres too
> much ? I'm guessing a CTE of some sort ?
>
>
Suggest you provide your desired output in table format, and show “the
query” that you mention.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Sjøgren | 2020-08-19 14:45:00 | Re: Database logins taking longer and longer, showing up as "authentication" in ps(1) |
Previous Message | Laura Smith | 2020-08-19 13:38:51 | Inline count on a query |