Re: question on parsing postgres sql queries

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jerome Wagner <jerome(dot)wagner(at)laposte(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: question on parsing postgres sql queries
Date: 2016-07-26 19:52:03
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbHMaKc6H+m0Rhq_GycL5WsyQM=SiYhpoytmXcGGzySqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Jerome Wagner <jerome(dot)wagner(at)laposte(dot)net>
wrote:

>
> Would it make sense to use these sgml synopsis as some kind of source of
> truth, parse them, and automatically generate a parser for a specifc
> language ?
>

​What problem are you trying to solve here?​ to whit not everything that
can be parsed is documented - usually intentionally.

> Could the parser commiters share some lights on how the documentation
> process interacts with the parser commits ?
>
>
​Commits that modify the parser are expected to have manual modifications
to the relevant documentation ​as well.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2016-07-26 19:54:59 Re: yum repo, pgloader
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-07-26 19:50:18 Re: question on parsing postgres sql queries