| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Connection options |
| Date: | 2017-06-15 20:46:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbHE4MD64zaK3ESkkiTYkmoMxqw8wVpmFYBT8d1xnGD7Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> And could you clarify on the first part of this?
> From the quote I poste it sounds like this is available only in
> command-line
> tools. And if someone will use it inside the program it will be ignored.
>
The options you pass from the client via the "options" attribute are
interpreted by *the server* as command-line options. They are not options
that control libpq itself.
I can kinda see the confusion here but I'm not sure how to write it more
clearly without being excessively verbose. I haven't seen this particular
confusion before so I'd say the wording is reasonable and the mailing lists
are doing their job of providing a forum for providing clarity.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Igor Korot | 2017-06-15 21:41:46 | Re: Connection options |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2017-06-15 20:36:04 | Re: Connection options |