Re: Lack of detailed documentation

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Strauss, Randy (ARC-AF)[SGT, INC]" <randolph(dot)a(dot)strauss(at)nasa(dot)gov>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lack of detailed documentation
Date: 2020-04-23 00:31:14
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbGoOZ=HKZq+N4tNyxyeX19eWFUWr4AWe50rhu63TsEGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 4:36 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Surely Lockhart[1] got this
> definition from someplace, though, and didn't invent it out of thin air.
>

I actually viewed quite a few YouTube math videos between then and now and
looking at it now it seems familiar.

It is basically treating the points as if they were a representation of
complex numbers with x being real and y being imaginary.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number (Multiplication and Division
sections)

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-04-23 00:47:18 Re: Lack of detailed documentation
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2020-04-23 00:22:46 Re: Lack of detailed documentation