| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "j(dot)v(dot)keller(at)t-online(dot)de" <j(dot)v(dot)keller(at)t-online(dot)de>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: string_agg |
| Date: | 2023-12-28 22:52:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbGRVkSVnVmvMR6Gq+SnUSHyH7VVa2BO+vJDTjqSc5umA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wednesday, December 27, 2023, PG Doc comments form <
noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/functions-aggregate.html
> Description:
>
> Please add the argument "distinct" to the documentation of the
> aggregate-function "string_agg". It's used to omit any duplicates in the
> result string.
>
string_agg isn’t special in this regard so instead of cluttering up every
function with distinct we instead choose to document it as a syntax feature
of aggregate functions in general.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-expressions.html#SYNTAX-AGGREGATES
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dull Bananas | 2023-12-30 00:25:30 | Transition relation clarification |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2023-12-27 22:38:53 | string_agg |