Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
Date: 2025-04-09 20:13:34
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbC+3Vk5EJsEiUCtLdORE2-Jq-J8+xAUG5fV2-nkP3r3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, 12:56 Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> What I am saying is n_ins_since_vacuum should not account for aborted
> inserts.
>

It does and from what I can see it should. You need to explain why it
should not. More importantly, convincingly enough to change five year old
behavior.

You should get away from showing counts and talk about system behavior.
Or, if this is accounting related, explain the math.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2025-04-09 20:19:12 Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2025-04-09 19:58:32 Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions