From: | David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand |
Date: | 2015-02-03 01:47:47 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbBeGHmxW8DEGSRBZ4xqfg_Gtp6uvRpc-cCx30AopcYNQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Peter Eisentraut-2 [via PostgreSQL] <
ml-node+s1045698n5836471h25(at)n5(dot)nabble(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2/1/15 11:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think it's time we changed the policy of including all release notes
> > back to the beginning in Appendix E.
>
> I share the sentiment that the release notes *seem* too big, but the
> subsequent discussion shows that it's not clear why that's really a
> problem. Exactly what problem are we trying to fix?
>
>
We'd get a lines-of-code decrease which would translate into a improvement
in the make process time; most noticeable for someone doing a doc-only
build, multiple times, to see how a doc change looks. No time percentage
has been provided yet but the goal seems reasonable in theory.
David J.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Release-note-bloat-is-getting-out-of-hand-tp5836330p5836473.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-02-03 01:59:56 | Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-02-03 01:39:25 | Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand |