Re: Seeking Clarification on Function Definitions in PostgreSQL Extensions

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Seeking Clarification on Function Definitions in PostgreSQL Extensions
Date: 2024-06-18 17:57:41
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbBAks7=R0GDmSY91YGLp3_kt7nQ3_K_4u38GLz34NbLA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tuesday, June 18, 2024, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> But I stand by returning OUT params and records at the same time.
>

You mean you dislike adding the optional returns clause when output
parameters exist? Because the out parameters and the “record” represent
the exact same thing.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2024-06-18 18:27:10 Re: Seeking Clarification on Function Definitions in PostgreSQL Extensions
Previous Message Dmitry O Litvintsev 2024-06-18 17:56:53 Re: fail to install postgresql15 on Alma9