Re: Unexpected table size usage for small composite arrays

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Erik Sjoblom <sjoblom65(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unexpected table size usage for small composite arrays
Date: 2024-10-22 23:42:56
Message-ID: CAKFQuwb5FJt9NfnNQ-itdq1zWu=xh0NDQTNm93DdpbuKQ1VUeg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 4:40 PM Erik Sjoblom <sjoblom65(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I hear what you are saying Tom and what I have read says that it would
> take 24 + 12 x N bytes for the array.
>

Whatever you are reading, or your interpretation of it, is flawed.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2024-10-22 23:49:28 Re: Unexpected table size usage for small composite arrays
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2024-10-22 23:41:22 Re: Unexpected table size usage for small composite arrays