Re: Query optimization

From: David Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jorge Arevalo <jorgearevalo(at)libregis(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Query optimization
Date: 2014-10-29 19:47:53
Message-ID: CAKFQuwb4_k86x7_J4Hx6KOCzkgCY8u49cbsdqdRV-B_saa6HSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jorge Arevalo <jorgearevalo(at)libregis(dot)org>
wrote:

>
> SELECT value1,value2,value3,value4, value5, hstore(ARRAY['field9',
> 'field10', 'field11', 'field12', 'field13', 'field14'], ARRAY[field9,
> field10, field11, field12, field13, field14]) as metadata, value7, (select
> array((select row(f1, f2) from table2 p where p.f3 = field7))) as
> values_array FROM table1
>

​More generally, you really should table-prefix all column in correlated
subqueries.

[...] from table2 p where p.f3 = table1.field7 [...]

​I guess the InitPlan 1 you showed simply scanned table2 and applied the
filter which then was fed to InitPlan 2 where the array is built; that
array then is inserted into the outer query ~8M​ times...

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jorge Arevalo 2014-10-29 20:26:01 Re: Query optimization
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-10-29 19:39:42 Re: Query optimization