From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql's \d and \dt are sending their complaints to different output files |
Date: | 2017-06-19 22:04:21 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwb27M3VXRhHErjCpkWwN9eKThbqWb1=trtoXi9_ejqPXQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> The docs also indicate that we don't include materialized views as
>> part of "\d" which seems like an oversight somewhere.
>
> Where are you reading that?
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/app-psql.html
First sentence:
"For each relation (table, view, index, sequence, or foreign table) or
composite type matching the pattern..."
I was expecting "materialized view" to be one of the parenthetical options.
> Experimentation shows that "\d" does include
> matviews, and that matches the code, which has this as the default
> expansion of \d:
>
> /* standard listing of interesting things */
> success = listTables("tvmsE", NULL, show_verbose, show_system);
>
\dT / "composite type" seems to be a special case.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-06-19 22:12:15 | Re: UPDATE of partition key |
Previous Message | Mark Rofail | 2017-06-19 22:02:37 | Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |