Re: Is there an undocumented Syntax Check in Meson?

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there an undocumented Syntax Check in Meson?
Date: 2024-05-09 20:30:38
Message-ID: CAKFQuway-vKa0ykokyo-=1ECw4vHPorjL+Mzv2ZnHNJbUtfNvg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 1:16 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 2024-05-09 09:23:37 -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > This needs updating:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/docguide-build-meson.html
>
> You mean it should have a syntax target? Or that something else is out of
> date?
>
>
v17 looks good, I like the auto-generation. I failed to notice I was
looking at v16 when searching for a check docs target.

> Also, as a sanity check, running that command takes my system 1 minute.
> Any
> > idea what percentile that falls into?
>
> I think that's on the longer end - what OS/environment is this on? Even on
> ~5yo CPU with turbo boost disabled it's 48s for me. FWIW, the single-page
> html is a good bit faster, 29s on the same system.
>

Ubuntu 22.04 running in AWS Workspaces Power.

Amazon EC2 t3.xlarge
Intel® Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz × 4
16GiB Ram

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2024-05-09 20:32:08 Re: partitioning and identity column
Previous Message Andres Freund 2024-05-09 20:18:30 Re: Is there an undocumented Syntax Check in Meson?