Re: "two time periods with only an endpoint in common do not overlap" ???

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bryn Llewellyn <bryn(at)yugabyte(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general list <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "two time periods with only an endpoint in common do not overlap" ???
Date: 2021-10-15 00:24:49
Message-ID: CAKFQuwauHqVP4R8CoBUqf2uLbxM5m=RhzaHrmh2qH3P561x8DA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, 16:38 Bryn Llewellyn <bryn(at)yugabyte(dot)com> wrote:

> . This means for instance that two time periods with only an endpoint in
> common do not overlap.
>
>
A range has two endpoints. The one at the later (end) of the range and the
one at the earlier (start). I suppose rewording it to say "boundary point"
in common would avoid the ambiguity in the use of the word "end".

>
David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-10-15 02:49:51 Re: "two time periods with only an endpoint in common do not overlap" ???
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2021-10-15 00:02:22 Re: "two time periods with only an endpoint in common do not overlap" ???