From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | digoal zhou <digoal(dot)zhou(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Can we add syntax for references auto create index or not. |
Date: | 2015-05-27 17:41:27 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwatm5D-d2eo2ZkD49k2eg3bAnEs_C6vNuqmWnzfSOO5Qg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:03 PM, digoal zhou <digoal(dot)zhou(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> When we create table, some column use foreign key references.
> Now PostgreSQL don't create index for the FK, and there is no problem.
> But when some body need the index to speed up the query within these APP,
> they need to add the index manual one-by-one when has many tables.
> If we can add syntax for auto create index for FK by user's choose, and
> default not create?
>
I presume you mean to modify the CREATE TABLE statement.
How does this help solve the problem "when some body need the index to
speed up the query"?
My first impression is that I like the idea. The fact that it is not
supported by the SQL standard is a drawback Do any other vendors do this?
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-05-27 17:42:44 | Re: pg_upgrade resets timeline to 1 |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-05-27 16:54:45 | Re: Triggers on transaction? |