From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | o1bigtenor <o1bigtenor(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, svsn2(at)yahoo(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres |
Date: | 2021-01-15 16:06:18 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaosm6jy7Rqj36Tz=kwXbo6G_jjtBiS7LKndtECKAzO3w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 8:56 AM Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi o1bigtenor,
>
> Now what will you say about below query that he should have come with some
> research before asking here ?
>
Yes. The question gets asked frequently so if one searches the archive
usually you'll get a thread from the past 6 months or so which is usually
recent enough. Plus lots of people publish blog posts and articles on the
topic, which are probably more well written and researched than
off-the-cuff replies to a mailing list would be. At least posting "hey, I
found these three tools, and am leaning toward such-and-such because of
reasons, does anyone have any thoughts I should consider?" would should the
effort and allow for better responses since at least some background is
given. Knowing generally how the poster uses PostgreSQL also helps and
should be included.
A posting like this I'll usually just ignore since I know that answers
already exist to be found, and it is not something that I have chosen to
become a "librarian/interactive assistant" for - I relegate to the
documentation for that.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2021-01-15 16:10:01 | Re: Accounting for between table correlation |
Previous Message | Atul Kumar | 2021-01-15 15:56:12 | Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres |