Re: embedded composite types

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Arturo Guadagnin <tuirutuiru(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-sql(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: embedded composite types
Date: 2021-02-20 15:07:49
Message-ID: CAKFQuwamyzHNptbFL29wo7H4WwVTY6PV3SBwN51AzKB0bCkfGg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Saturday, February 20, 2021, Arturo Guadagnin <tuirutuiru(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> I’m just wondering whether this is the expected behaviour or if there is
> any syntactical magic I’m not aware of ....
>

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-expressions.html#FIELD-SELECTION

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-02-20 15:58:21 Re: embedded composite types
Previous Message Arturo Guadagnin 2021-02-20 14:41:09 embedded composite types