Re: concurrent re-partitioning of declarative partitioned tables

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nick Cleaton <nick(at)cleaton(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: concurrent re-partitioning of declarative partitioned tables
Date: 2020-12-02 16:07:45
Message-ID: CAKFQuwag2WvGOJkOMkxTrZTB_FSVT_U4-+aQKGszHzmX3U5SoA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:36 AM Nick Cleaton <nick(at)cleaton(dot)net> wrote:

> I want to set up a large table on postgresql 12.4, using declarative
> partitioning to partition by record creation date. I'd like to have recent
> records in small partitions but old records in a few larger partitions, so
> I want merges. The merges should be concurrent, in the sense that they lock
> out readers or writers only for very short intervals if at all.
>

Once a date has passed is the table for that date effectively read-only?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nick Cleaton 2020-12-02 16:22:05 Re: concurrent re-partitioning of declarative partitioned tables
Previous Message Michael Lewis 2020-12-02 15:59:32 Re: concurrent re-partitioning of declarative partitioned tables