From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John McKown <john(dot)archie(dot)mckown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Processing data from table using awk. |
Date: | 2015-10-06 14:20:43 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaeDrYP0ft3AfuQ4i8_k8so_aPVZmACq4OwrB-X1=JPdw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:04 AM, John McKown <john(dot)archie(dot)mckown(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> I'm wanting to do some reporting on data which I have an a PostgreSQL
> table. For lack of anything better, I've decided to see if I can do it in
> GNU awk. OK, using Perl with DBI might be a better idea, I'll grant you
> that. Or maybe Python or Ruby (which I don't know). But out of shear
> cussedness, I'm going to see what I can do in gawk. What I don't see is a
> way to get the data out of PostgreSQL and into my awk program. Does anybody
> know of a way to do this, short of "cheating" by using psql? Yes, I know
> that I could do something like (BASH on Linux/Fedora 22 x86_64):
>
> awk -f some-program.awk <(echo 'SELECT a, b, c, d FROM schema.table ORDER
> BY a' | psql dbname)
>
While not an expert on awk I believe this ^ is how the program is designed
to function.
> What I was hoping for was a "Dynamic Extension" (dll) which would allow
> "native" use of PostgreSQL, or may ODBC. But I haven't found any. Have I
> missed anything? If I were to create such a beastie, would it be of any use
> to others? I guess, in this, I'm wondering what "report writer" most are
> using when psql just doesn't have sufficient capability.
>
>
Birt, Jasper Reports, or Crystal Reports to name a few well-known ones.
> Yeah, sometimes I'm just plain stupid & pig headed. But then it will be a
> "leaning experience" (with associated scars, I'm sure).
>
If you don't understand the nature of awk or *NIX in general (dll is a
Window's thing) you are likely going to end up with much worse than scars.
Amputation is likely to be required.
To a large degree one is expected to use BASH (or another shell scripting
language) if they want to compose programs from *NIX commands. To choose
to use awk but then discard psql makes little sense. If you need something
more holistic and/or capable you should just upgrade to a general-purpose
language (e.g., Perl) or a custom-built solution (e.g. Birt).
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2015-10-06 14:22:38 | Re: Processing data from table using awk. |
Previous Message | Melvin Davidson | 2015-10-06 14:15:46 | Re: Processing data from table using awk. |