Re: Range Partitioning behaviour - query

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Range Partitioning behaviour - query
Date: 2017-02-24 01:38:36
Message-ID: CAKFQuwab5=9nkUnzWubFYssowKDoo9eFG05LhVLq_kZ7kj4cyQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
> wrote:

> On 2017/02/24 8:38, Venkata B Nagothi wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
> >> Upper bound of a range partition is an exclusive bound. A note was
> added
> >> recently to the CREATE TABLE page to make this clear.
> >>
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-createtable.html
> >
> >
> > Thanks. Actually, my confusion was that the upper bound value would be
> > included when "TO" clause is used in the syntax.
>
> Hmm, TO sounds like it implies inclusive.
>

​I think most common usage of the word ends up being inclusive but the word
itself doesn't really care.​

Dictionary.com has a good example:

"We work from nine to five." - you leave at the beginning of the 5 o'clock
hour (I'm going for casual usage here)

Since our implementation of ranges is half-open the usage here is
consistent with that concept. That it doesn't match BETWEEN is actually
somewhat nice since you can use ranges for half-open and BETWEEN if you
want to be concise with fully-closed endpoints. But it is one more thing
to remember.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2017-02-24 02:01:40 Re: Range Partitioning behaviour - query
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-02-24 01:34:27 Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums