From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "julius(dot)ernesti(at)kpi4me(dot)de" <julius(dot)ernesti(at)kpi4me(dot)de>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18457: Possible data loss needs to be evaluated |
Date: | 2024-05-07 12:20:38 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaafYfpNTF0G+M47JnpnG-Wa3xAsbH+k0WM5LRX8NUucw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tuesday, May 7, 2024, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 18457
> Logged by: Julius Ernesti
> Email address: julius(dot)ernesti(at)kpi4me(dot)de
> PostgreSQL version: 14.10
> Operating system: Rocky Linux 9
> Description:
>
> For the sake of simplicity, here is another example: There are two
> connections A and B
>
> Via A: insert into test (id, val) values (2, 'this will be a unique key
> constraint error'); --> The Rollback statement will not be executed due to
> an unknown error
> Via B: insert into test (id, val) values (4, 'no error'); --> Successful
> Transaction
> Via A: insert into test (id, val) values (5, 'no error, but the is
> currently
> a running transaction') --> Failed. Maybe a rollback is executed, I dont
> know
> Via B; select * from test where id = 4; --> Empty query
>
If you actually perform that algorithm manually using two psql sessions you
will find, if done properly, that the row with id=4 exists. If it does not
then show that work because you will indeed have found a bug. But as of
now you have not demonstrated a bug in PostgreSQL.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sujeet Swaminath | 2024-05-07 12:49:55 | Re: BUG #18333: Postgres is crashing if we have special character in the query |
Previous Message | Julius Ernesti | 2024-05-07 11:31:36 | Re: BUG #18457: Possible data loss needs to be evaluated |