| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lucas Possamai <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: gin index postgres 9.2 |
| Date: | 2016-05-25 23:48:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaaN9LbWczj_HgTY-Zk_ixVsfCT0V_q+y4-dsyza3O1PA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:42 PM, David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Lucas Possamai <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> yes.. I thought too.
>>
>> the results r still different
>>
>
> What's the query with the revised parentheses?
>
>
Never mind...your right I doubt that it should matter.
What I would do is remove the whole "count(DISTINCT)" part and select * -
and then add a LIMIT 10 and an ORDER BY to both the before and after. If
we see the data it might help to explain the behavior.
It could be a bug...but you'd need to provide a self-contained script so
that someone else can confirm.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-26 00:09:19 | Re: gin index postgres 9.2 |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-25 23:42:10 | Re: gin index postgres 9.2 |