Re: BUG #18193: CVE-2019-9193

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "sumanth(dot)vankineni(at)gmail(dot)com" <sumanth(dot)vankineni(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #18193: CVE-2019-9193
Date: 2023-11-13 15:30:18
Message-ID: CAKFQuwaaDpEtRgFABUhN1J_peBRHGez5M564uiwfSK59iy9wmg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Monday, November 13, 2023, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > Just wanted to give an update, I'm not sure if it's mentioned anywhere on
> > the website. The PostgreSQl version 13.7 is also vuln to the
> > CVE-2019-9193.
> > The CVE states only In PostgreSQL 9.3 through 11.2.
>
> Please see
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/cve-2019-9193-not-
> a-security-vulnerability-1935/
>
> That CVE is erroneous in full, and so the fact that it also misstates
> relevant versions is hardly surprising.
>
>
It’s hardly surprising because a CVE from 2019 (they make this fairly
simple, the year is in the assigned number) would not be expected to list
version 13 as that was not released at the time. Assuming 11.2 was indeed
the most recent version released at the time the CVE was issued then indeed
neither v12 nor v13 were relevant as v11 was only about 6 months old.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abdullah Ergin 2023-11-13 18:00:17 Re: BUG #18179: Cluster History Error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-11-13 15:20:30 Re: BUG #18193: CVE-2019-9193