Re: Extension security improvement: Add support for extensions with an owned schema

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extension security improvement: Add support for extensions with an owned schema
Date: 2024-06-19 15:22:14
Message-ID: CAKFQuwaT4_n=e0YKBZAyox1CQUra2ka0cySs+3pGZR5p50pn-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:19 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:

> Because part of it would
> only be relevant once we support upgrading from PG18. So for now the
> upgrade_code I haven't actually run.
>

Does it apply against v16? If so, branch off there, apply it, then upgrade
from the v16 branch to master.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-06-19 15:28:46 Re: Extension security improvement: Add support for extensions with an owned schema
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-06-19 15:19:14 Re: Extension security improvement: Add support for extensions with an owned schema