From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bankim Bhavsar <bankim(at)nimblestorage(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Index corruption |
Date: | 2015-03-24 18:56:50 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaOyhFzXXjZ3tD6L7_jYGzi9Nm1TrBi56xB8-rAzaGNuw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday, March 24, 2015, Bankim Bhavsar <bankim(at)nimblestorage(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello postgres experts,
>
> We are running a test that periodically abruptly kills postgres
> process(equivalent to kill -9) and restarts it.
> After running this test for 24 hrs or so, we see duplicate primary key
> entries in postgres table.
>
> We detect this as we load internal hash-table data-structure in a separate
> process with primary key entries.
>
> Before hitting this issue we see following warning messages in pg_log
>
> 17365 2015-03-24 03:01:42.729 GMTWARNING: page is not marked all-visible
> but visibility map bit is set in relation "table_foo" page 12
> 17365 2015-03-24 03:01:42.729 GMTWARNING: page is not marked all-visible
> but visibility map bit is set in relation "table_foo" page 13
>
>
>
> Some information about postgres setup.
> - 9.2.0
> - We use standard configuration with shared_buffer setting as 32MB and
> checkpoint_timeout as 1 min.
> - In this particular case postgres replication is not enabled.
>
> Let me know if more information is needed to help understand this issue.
>
> Any help or pointers will be appreciated.
>
>
If you really are running 9.2.0 instead of 9.2.10 you should upgrade and
reconfirm.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bankim Bhavsar | 2015-03-24 19:05:03 | Re: Index corruption |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2015-03-24 18:55:20 | Re: Index corruption |