| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump |
| Date: | 2018-01-23 02:07:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaJC6z+nYOBu8uSQX3oqPxDVUa7wtci42tWwtaNQRMSAw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, January 22, 2018, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
> In the end, I feel like this patch has actually been through the ringer
> and back because it was brought up in the context of solving a problem
> that we'd all like to fix in a better way. Had it been simply dropped
> on us as a "I'd like to not have comments in my pg_dump output and
> here's a patch to allow me to do that" I suspect it would have been
> committed without anywhere near this level of effort.
>
+0; but recognizing our users are going to remain annoyed by the existing
problem and that telling them that this is the answer will not sit well.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-01-23 02:07:33 | Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-01-23 01:59:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock in XLogInsert at AIX |