| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Cory <dcory(at)tableau(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation for alternate names of functions |
| Date: | 2018-09-04 21:36:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwaEYXrB5AgHoJTm37tG=YurF9LWNfNFyPTm_MiykVpEXQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Daniel Cory <dcory(at)tableau(dot)com> wrote:
> Can we document that “pow” is the same as “power”? It is not listed on
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-math.html, even
> though both “ceil” and “ceiling” are listed.
>
> For aliased function names for which only one is SQL standard we should
denote which one. This particular alias seems worthy of inclusion.
>
>
> Can we document “int4larger” and related functions? They are similar to
> the greatest/least functions but not listed on https://www.postgresql.org/
> docs/current/static/functions-conditional.html#FUNCTIONS-GREATEST-LEAST
>
I don't see the point of exposing this implementation detail when the
greatest/least expressions (i.e., they don't appear under \df), though
non-standard, are what users are encouraged to use. Not sure we'd turn
down a patch but its not something I'd expect to get picked up in a timely
fashion.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-09-04 21:57:23 | Re: Documentation for alternate names of functions |
| Previous Message | Daniel Cory | 2018-09-04 21:17:16 | Documentation for alternate names of functions |