Re: Optimize query for listing un-read messages

From: David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Optimize query for listing un-read messages
Date: 2014-05-01 23:58:04
Message-ID: CAKFQuwaB0_HQ6A2Gj9BXhButJxdj1g4=RcehdQ4vAroxk6PLWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>
>
> Per-User caching does seem to be something that is going to be needed...
>
> Depending on how many users are being tracked would storing the "reader_id"
> in an indexed array improve matters? " SELECT ... FROM message WHERE NOT
> (1
> = ANY(reader_ids)) ; UPDATE message SET reader_ids = reader_ids || 1 WHERE
> messageid = ..." I'm not that familiar with how well indexes over arrays
> work or which kind is needed (i.e. gin/gist).
>
>
>
> "is_read" is one of many properties being tracked for a message...
>
>
​But you don't have to have all of them on the same table. Once you've
identified the messages in question performing a standard join onto a
supplemental detail table should be fairly straight-forward.

Do these other properties have values when "is_read" is false or only when
"is_read" is true? Since you already allow for the possibility of a
missing record (giving it the meaning of "not read")​ these other
properties cannot currently exist in that situation.

David J.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Optimize-query-for-listing-un-read-messages-tp5802097p5802174.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2014-05-02 00:10:05 Re: Optimize query for listing un-read messages
Previous Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2014-05-01 23:51:14 Re: Optimize query for listing un-read messages