Re: Concurrent CTE

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Artur Formella <a(dot)formella(at)tme3c(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concurrent CTE
Date: 2018-04-05 04:46:22
Message-ID: CAKFQuwa6us78+gn9QG_ACj8-Bkd+zaPJSEuiTj8DBwqx8aLAHg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018, Artur Formella <a(dot)formella(at)tme3c(dot)com> wrote:

>
> And the question: is it possible to achieve more concurrent execution plan
> to reduce the response time? For example:
> Thread1: aa | dd | ff | primary
> Thread2: bb | ee | gg
> Thread3: cc | -- | hh
>

If and how depends greatly on your version.

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/parallel-query.html

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-04-05 05:12:45 Re: Concurrent CTE
Previous Message Jeremy Finzel 2018-04-05 04:31:16 Re: Concurrent CTE