From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | konkove(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The option was not described: connection-option |
Date: | 2024-09-19 17:47:56 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwa5xgoBkHSMJdQZxN+iBmpyiVDox_97Suup0itA3ub15w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:31 AM PG Doc comments form <
noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/app-pgdump.html
> Description:
>
> Hi.
>
> The option `connection-option` is mentioned but is not described.
>
> Please describe it.
>
>
They are described though the terminology is a bit inconsistent:
<command> also accepts the following command-line arguments for connection
parameters:
The items listed beneath that sentence fragment are the connection-options.
If someone wants to go, IMO, busy-fix all of the pages that use the above
wording to better align with the synopsis I won't argue. But it's low on
my priority list.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-09-19 17:50:30 | Re: The option was not described: connection-option |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-09-19 17:36:51 | Re: 15.7 and 16.3 release notes are exactly the same on postgresql.org |