From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Doc] Improvements to ddl.sgl Privileges Section and Glossary |
Date: | 2024-04-22 21:29:54 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwa5m-MA=M2yfrk1bpnm-2Qy4qwia2C26fdN0pnBvQ1bFQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Any thoughts?
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 1:59 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> In a nearby user complaint email [1] some missing information regarding
> ownership reassignment came to light. I took that and went a bit further
> to add what I felt was further missing information and context for how the
> privilege system is designed. I've tried to formalize and label existing
> concepts a bit and updated the glossary accordingly.
>
> The attached is a partial rewrite of the patch on the linked post after
> those comments were taken into consideration.
>
> The new glossary entry for privileges defines various qualifications of
> the term that are used in the new prose. I've marked up each of the
> variants and point them all back to the main entry. I didn't try to
> incorporate those terms, or even really look, anywhere else in the
> documentation. If the general idea is accepted that kind of work can be
> done as a follow-up.
>
> David J.
>
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d294818d12280f6223ddf169ab5454927f5186b6.camel%40cybertec.at
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-04-22 22:10:17 | Re: fix tablespace handling in pg_combinebackup |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2024-04-22 21:23:52 | Re: fix tablespace handling in pg_combinebackup |