Re: Add a new table for Transaction Isolation?

On Wednesday, April 15, 2015, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 08:00:38PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/transaction-iso.html
> >
> > Table 13-1 shows the SQL standard isolation levels and what is and is not
> > guaranteed. Then the text goes on to explain how our implementation
> differs
> > from that table. Is there any opposition to actually adding a similar
> table,
> > 13-2, probably right after the paragraph, with the same columns, three
> rows,
> > and the corresponding possible/not-possible cell values?
>
> Yes, it does make sense to have a table that properly matches the
> Postgres implementation. Should I write a patch or would you like to?
>
>
I'll take a crack at it.

David J.